Cur Non Avatar

8 Notes

hodgman:

Here’s @David_Rees discussing KICK ASS WATER. 

GOING DEEP WITH DAVID REES = tonight at 10PM on @NatGeoChannel.

That is all. 

Good, old-fashioned, scientific experiments. That lady was a good sport.

28 Notes

277 Notes

amnhnyc:

In celebration of our new film, Great White Shark, now playing in 3D and 2D at the Museum, today’s peek into the archives is a mouthful.
“Seated in fossil shark jaw restoration” was taken by H.S. Rice in January, 1927, after the restoration of the jaws of the fossil shark, Carcharodon megalodon. 
Learn more about the prehistoric predator, Carcharodon, and our new film, Great White Shark. 
AMNH/319969

amnhnyc:

In celebration of our new film, Great White Shark, now playing in 3D and 2D at the Museum, today’s peek into the archives is a mouthful.

Seated in fossil shark jaw restoration” was taken by H.S. Rice in January, 1927, after the restoration of the jaws of the fossil shark, Carcharodon megalodon

Learn more about the prehistoric predator, Carcharodon, and our new film, Great White Shark

AMNH/319969

5 Notes

SHIRTERATE

We’ll tell you about your gross ear hair. We know that your pants are two sizes too big and look really weird, like you’re secretly in a diaper. It’s fine if you are, of course. We have no beef with plushies and furries and diaper kid roleplay. But we know about your bad shoe stank. Most of all, we know how cheap your suit is. Ew, why so cheap? And we’ll remind you that shirts get tucked into pants. What’s more, we know why no one will tell you. Because they hate you. I mean, we kinda do too! 

11 Notes

😎🍺🍋🗿🇺🇸

😎🍺🍋🗿🇺🇸

1 Notes

First Watch: Hospitality, 'I Miss Your Bones'

354 Notes

colin-vian:

  1927 Margaret Preston

colin-vian:

  1927 Margaret Preston

663 Notes

582 Notes

SCOTUS admits it doesn’t even believe its own argument in the Hobby Lobby case, and says so in the ruling.

spytap:

If you read the ruling, SCOTUS even admits that the ruling makes so little sense, that it HAS to be applied solely to the single area of contraceptives, or it becomes even more fucked up:

In any event, our decision in these cases is concerned solely with the contraceptive mandate. Our decision should not be understood to hold that an insurance coverage mandate must necessarily fall if it conflicts with an employer’s religious beliefs. Other coverage requirements, such as immunizations, may be supported by different interests (for example, the need to combat thespread of infectious diseases) and may involve different arguments about the least restrictive means of providing them.

Meaning, the court understands that logically their argument makes no sense in the broad scheme of things, and if you follow the logic it basically puts the US into a feudal system, but if they can carve out this one exception to logic, reason, and the rule of law, they’re okay with doing so.

There’s no reason that a “closely-held” corporation (like 90% of US corps) can’t have a moral religious exception to blood transfusions or organ donations (see: Jehovah’s Witnesses, for example) but those corporations can’t deny coverage of such for “religious exception” under this ruling - it’s just this one category of contraception women’s contraception that can be exempted, because…well, they never really explain why. They’re willing to admit that overall the whole proposition is fucking nutter, but never get around to saying why this one category is so special that it requires the existence of religious exception, aside from it being an area that people have been trying to limit for decades.

Long story short: SCOTUS recognizes the hypocrisy in their decision, and actively carve out denials against the logical extension of their own ruling. THAT’S the most fucked-up part of this whole thing: the five men in favor of this decision have to admit that their logic isn’t sound, and that if taken to it’s logical conclusion would be catastrophic - so instead of asking why their logic isn’t sound, they say “So it only applies to this one area. No others. And only if you really believe. Like…like a lot.”

Ugh Jesus CHRIST.

I MEAN:

JEEEESUS CHRIIIIIIST

1938 Notes

27890 Notes

red-bird-writes:

coketalk:

"An Illustrated Guide to American Personhood" by Sarah Baker

I have never wanted to post something so bad to Facebook…

red-bird-writes:

coketalk:

"An Illustrated Guide to American Personhood" by Sarah Baker

I have never wanted to post something so bad to Facebook…

107 Notes

livelymorgue:

Feb. 14, 1931: “She rivals the best of the masculine speedboat racers,” the picture’s caption reads. Loretta Turnbull of Monrovia, Calif., won “fifty trophies, forty-five of which were won in competition with men.” A few years later, when she received kidnapping threats at her home, her father, Rupert, boasted of the family’s prowess with guns. “Mr. Turnbull said he was turning his ranch into an armed camp,” The Times reported. “Loretta and her three brothers,” Mr. Turnbull was quoted as saying, “were all taught the use of firearms and how to shoot straight and rapidly. We feel that we are able to take care of ourselves.” Photo: The New York Times

Notes

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

233 Notes

thenearsightedmonkey:

Even more summer lovin’ from Marlys!

40 Notes